Thread:SupcommMonroee/@comment-4068313-20120508012411/@comment-796766-20120508200257

I am largely OK with the lot of it save the names. As the unofficial expert on all things science related, I do have one major concern: The chrysalis. It seems a little too far fetched how it results in prefect hibernation. I mean, this is the kind of thing real life scientists clamor and kill for. Though the evolution into Elda Valaquentii is almost on the edge, I'm OK with it, since it is science fiction. But perfect hibernation? If you could add some kind of greater drawback to this, or remake it in some other way so that it's a bit more realistic. Just a bit. It's fiction, but we aim for some level of believability for sake of good writing. Perhaps use of the chrysalis hibernation carries the considerable risk of some serious genetic/physical/mental disorder, like sterility, paralysis, or a personality rewrite? Something to make it seem like a bad idea to use hibernation for too long, because otherwise, it's just too perfect. Other than that issue, change the names, and I am happy.