Board Thread:Planning/@comment-1743498-20131214024110/@comment-3155949-20131216235659

I think consistency would still be a problem. We'd have a lot of conflicting timeframes to work with when it comes to factual articles. I think my Wikipedia analogy is still relevant.

That aside, I have a further idea for the wiki that's a bit more drastic (and different) that I think would take us on a much different path, albeit a more manageable and sensible one.